UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

pigskin Navy
  
Navy                  
W-L: ( 9- 2) PR = 80.5392

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 830 H VMI 52- 7 906 H UAB AME ( 4- 8, 69.5) 38-24 913 A Tulsa AME ( 4- 8, 69.1) 42-23 927 H Rice AME ( 5- 7, 69.5) 21-13 1004 H Air Force MIDW ( 5- 8, 73.3) 34-31 1011 A Temple AME ( 5- 7, 73.3) 32-31 1025 H Fla Atlantic AME ( 4- 8, 71.7) 42-32 1101 A No Texas AME (11- 2, 84.1) 17-31 1108 A Notre Dame IND (10- 2, 95.0) 10-49 1115 H So Florida AME ( 9- 3, 87.1) 41-38 1127 A Memphis AME ( 8- 4, 79.9) 28-17 1213 H Army AME ( 6- 5, 77.9)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   906 H UAB                    38-24      14    14           0.32
   913 A Tulsa                  42-23      19     9    ++     5.25
   927 H Rice                   21-13       8    14    --    -5.72
  1004 H Air Force              34-31       3    10    ---   -6.93
  1011 A Temple                 32-31       1     5    -     -3.55
  1025 H Fla Atlantic           42-32      10    12          -1.53
  1101 A No Texas               17-31     -14    -6    ---   -7.75
  1108 A Notre Dame             10-49     -39   -17           0.00
  1115 H So Florida             41-38       3    -4    +++    6.92
  1127 A Memphis                28-17      11    -2    +++   13.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1004 H Air Force              34-31       3    10    ---   -6.93
  1101 A No Texas               17-31     -14    -6    ---   -7.75
   927 H Rice                   21-13       8    14    --    -5.72
  1011 A Temple                 32-31       1     5    -     -3.55

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1115 H So Florida             41-38       3    -4    +++    6.92
  1127 A Memphis                28-17      11    -2    +++   13.00
   913 A Tulsa                  42-23      19     9    ++     5.25

Navy Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col ` Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
California Navy   Navy
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St Florida St   Florida St
Georgia Tech Georgia Tech tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Georgia Tech
Louisville Louisville   Louisville
Miami Miami insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Miami
UNC Navy   Navy
NC St NC St tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) NC St
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pittsburgh
SMU SMU   SMU
Stanford Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
Syracuse Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
Va Tech Navy   Navy
Wake Forest Navy   Navy
Army Navy insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) Navy
Charlotte Navy Navy   3- 1 vs 0- 4
Ea Carolina Ea Carolina tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) Ea Carolina
Fla Atlantic Navy Navy  
Memphis Navy Navy  
No Texas No Texas No Texas  
Rice Navy Navy  
So Florida Navy Navy  
Temple Navy Navy  
Tulane Tulane insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) Tulane
Tulsa Navy Navy  
UAB Navy Navy  
UTSA Navy Navy   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Arizona Arizona   Arizona
Arizona St Arizona St   Arizona St
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Navy   Navy
Cincinnati Cincinnati   Cincinnati
Colorado Navy   Navy
Houston Houston tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Houston
Iowa St Iowa St   Iowa St
Kansas Navy   Navy
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
TCU TCU   TCU
Texas Tech Texas Tech   Texas Tech
UCF Navy   Navy
Utah Utah   Utah
We Virginia Navy   Navy
Illinois Illinois   Illinois
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Michigan St Navy   Navy
Minnesota Navy   Navy
Nebraska Navy   Navy
Northwestern Navy   Navy
Ohio St Ohio St   Ohio St
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Purdue Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
Rutgers Navy   Navy
UCLA Navy   Navy
USC USC tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) USC
Washington Washington   Washington
Wisconsin Navy   Navy
Florida Intl Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
Jacksonv. St Navy   Navy
Kennesaw St Navy   Navy
Liberty Navy   Navy
La Tech Navy   Navy
Middle Tenn Navy   Navy
NM St Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
SHouston St Navy   Navy
UTEP Navy   Navy
We Kentucky Navy   Navy
UMass Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Notre Dame Notre Dame Notre Dame  
UConn Navy insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Navy
Akron Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Ball St Navy   Navy
Bowl. Green Navy   Navy
Buffalo Navy   Navy
Cen Michigan Navy   Navy
Ea Michigan Navy   Navy
Kent State Navy   Navy
MiamiOH Navy   Navy
No Illinois Navy   Navy
Ohio Navy   Navy
Toledo Navy   Navy
We Michigan Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
Air Force Navy Navy  
Boise State Boise State insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Boise State
Colorado St Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Fresno St Navy   Navy
Hawaii Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
Nevada Navy   Navy
New Mexico Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
San Diego St Navy   Navy
San Jose St Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
UNLV Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
Utah St Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
Wyoming Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Oregon St Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Wash St Wash St tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Wash St
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas Arkansas insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Arkansas
Auburn Auburn   Auburn
Florida Florida insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Florida
Georgia Georgia   Georgia
Kentucky Kentucky   Kentucky
LSU LSU   LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss St Miss St   Miss St
Oklahoma Oklahoma tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So Carolina So Carolina   So Carolina
Tennessee Tennessee tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tennessee
Texas Texas   Texas
Texas A&M Texas A&M insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt   Vanderbilt
App St Navy   Navy
Arkansas State Navy   Navy
Coastal Car Navy   Navy
Georgia So Navy   Navy
Georgia St Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
J Madison J Madison   J Madison
Louisiana Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
Marshall Navy   Navy
Old Dominion Navy   Navy
So Miss Navy   Navy
So Alabama Navy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Navy
Texas State Navy   Navy
Troy Navy insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Navy
La-Monroe Navy   Navy
Delaware Navy   Navy
Missouri St Navy   Navy

PowerWise = 83


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.13

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H UAB             ( 4- 8, 69.5)    38-24      -30.36      16.78      -2.67         1.21            34.24
   0 A Tulsa           ( 4- 8, 69.1)    42-23      -30.79      16.36       2.67         1.21            46.19
   0 H Rice            ( 5- 7, 69.5)    21-13      -30.40      16.75      -2.67         1.21            34.14
   0 H Air Force       ( 5- 8, 73.3)    34-31      -26.61      20.54      -2.67         1.21            43.34
   0 A Temple          ( 5- 7, 73.3)    32-31      -26.59      20.56       2.67         1.21            56.38
   0 H Fla Atlantic    ( 4- 8, 71.7)    42-32      -28.22      18.93      -2.67         1.21            39.45
   0 A No Texas        (11- 2, 84.1)    17-31      -15.78      31.36       2.67         1.21            -7.95
   0 A Notre Dame      (10- 2, 95.0)    10-49       -4.93      42.22       2.67         1.21            -1.37
   0 H So Florida      ( 9- 3, 87.1)    41-38      -12.77      34.38      -2.67         1.21            76.93
   0 A Memphis         ( 8- 4, 79.9)    28-17      -20.04      27.11       2.67         1.21            72.27
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       393.61

winning pts = 402.9372 losing points = -9.3227

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------